Albemarle Logo
File #: 19-107    Version: 1 Name:
Type: Resolution Status: Consent Agenda
File created: 12/12/2018 In control: Board of Supervisors
On agenda: 1/9/2019 Final action:
Title: Zero Lot Line ZTA
Attachments: 1. Attach. A - Zero Lot Line ROI
Date Ver.Action ByActionResultAction DetailsMeeting DetailsVideo
No records to display.
AGENDA DATE: 1/9/2019

TITLE:
Title
Zero Lot Line ZTA
BODY

SUBJECT/PROPOSAL/REQUEST: Resolution of Intent to amend the residential district setback and building separation regulations.

ITEM TYPE: Consent Action Item

STAFF CONTACT(S): Richardson, Walker, Kamptner, Herrick, Graham, McCulley, Brumfield

PRESENTER (S): N/A

LEGAL REVIEW: Yes

REVIEWED BY: Jeffrey B. Richardson

BACKGROUND: Currently, minimum non-infill side setbacks in residential districts are 0 feet. Building separations for non-infill residential structures are 10 feet unless a building shares a common wall. Additionally, in R-10 and R-15 districts, if the abutting lot is zoned residential other than R-10, R-15, RA, or Monticello Historic District, the building separation increases by 1 foot for every 1 foot the building exceeds thirty-five feet in height.

STRATEGIC PLAN: Mission: To enhance the well-being and quality of life for all citizens through the provision of the highest level of public service consistent with the prudent use of public funds; and
Quality Government Operations: Ensure County government's capacity to provide high quality service that achieves community priorities.

DISCUSSION: The current requirements for non-infill side setbacks and building separations result in an unbalanced advantage of lot utilization to the property owners who develop their lots before their neighbors. Additionally, a building placed too close to a shared lot line can result in trespass onto a neighboring property, either during the building's construction or during maintenance of the property. An amendment of County Code ? 18-4.19 to require minimum side setbacks for non-infill residential development would eliminate this unfair lot utilization and unintended trespass. If the Board adopts the attached Resolution of Intent (Attachment A), staff would bring a proposed zoning text amendment to the Planning Commission and the Board of Supervisors in 2019. Because this is a focused issu...

Click here for full text