Albemarle Logo
File #: 18-334    Version: 1 Name:
Type: Resolution Status: Action Items
File created: 5/15/2018 In control: Board of Supervisors
On agenda: 6/6/2018 Final action:
Title: 2018 Bond Referendum - Project Identification
AGENDA DATE: 6/6/2018

TITLE:
Title
2018 Bond Referendum - Project Identification
BODY

SUBJECT/PROPOSAL/REQUEST: Review and select capital projects to include on a November 2018 Bond Referendum

ITEM TYPE: Regular Action Item

STAFF CONTACT(S): Richardson, Walker, Letteri, Kamptner, Blair, and Allshouse, L.

PRESENTER (S): Lori Allshouse

LEGAL REVIEW: Yes

REVIEWED BY: Jeffrey B. Richardson

BACKGROUND: On March 1 and March 5, 2018, as part of the budget development process, the Board of Supervisors held work sessions on the Capital Improvement Program. During the work sessions, the Board reviewed the Recommended FY 19 Capital Budget (which is the first year of the FY 19 - FY 23 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP)) as well as the information that was included in the Recommended Budget document about other longer-term capital requests and resource implications. During these work sessions, the Board discussed potential bond referendums, and reviewed debt management information.

On March 27, as part of the Budget Work Session, the Board received an overview from School Division staff on the High School Capacity and Improvement Project CIP request, including the timing and cost estimates of the phases envisioned for this project. The Board chose to include Phase 1 of the High School Capacity and Improvement Project at $35.1 Million in the Proposed FY 19 Capital Budget, anticipating future discussion as to whether the project would be included in a 2018 Bond Referendum.

On March 29, the Board received further details from School Division staff regarding the School Division's High School pilot center, which was included in its operating budget, as well as other phases of the High School Capacity and Improvement Project. The Board also reviewed five potential FY 19 - FY 23 CIP scenarios and the associated cost estimates, and directed staff to bring back additional scenario models on April 10.

On April 10, the Board of Supervisors reviewed three additiona...

Click here for full text