Albemarle Logo
File #: 18-192    Version: 1 Name:
Type: Work Session - Information Status: Work Session
File created: 2/12/2018 In control: Board of Supervisors
On agenda: 3/7/2018 Final action:
Title: Residential Development Impact Work Group
Attachments: 1. Attach A - Charter for the Residential Development Impact Work Group, 2. Attach B - Residential Development Impact Work Group: Conclusions and Recommendations
Date Ver.Action ByActionResultAction DetailsMeeting DetailsVideo
No records to display.
AGENDA DATE: 3/7/2018

TITLE:
Title
Residential Development Impact Work Group
BODY

SUBJECT/PROPOSAL/REQUEST: Present the conclusions and recommendations of the Residential Development Impact Work Group.

ITEM TYPE: Regular Information Item

STAFF CONTACT(S): Richardson, Walker, Kamptner, Graham, Gast-Bray, Davis, Russell, Fritz

PRESENTER (S): Bill Fritz, Andrew Gast-Bray

LEGAL REVIEW: Not Required

REVIEWED BY: Jeffrey B. Richardson

BACKGROUND: In October 2016 the Board of Supervisors created the Residential Development Impact Work Group (Attachment A). The Board appointed members to the group in February 2016. The charge of the Work Group was to understand recent State Code amendments regarding proffers and to develop and analyze alternative means for determining and addressing the fiscal impact of residential development allowed either by-right or subsequent to a rezoning. The Work Group was also charged with providing a recommendation on how to proceed with addressing fiscal impacts of residential development.
STRATEGIC PLAN: Thriving Development Areas: Attract quality employment, commercial, and high density residential uses into development areas by providing services and infrastructure that encourage redevelopment and private investment while protecting the quality of neighborhoods

DISCUSSION: The Work Group held multiple meetings to discuss and understand the County's ability to accept off-site and cash proffers. The Work Group also analyzed all available provisions in the State Code that may allow the County to address the fiscal impact of residential development. Some of these included, use of existing proffer language in the State Code, drainage districts, service districts, road impact fees, general impact fees and use of special use permits for increased residential density. The Work Group concluded that none of the options seemed likely to provide enough revenue to meaningfully offset the fiscal impacts of new residential...

Click here for full text