Albemarle Logo
File #: 17-621    Version: 1 Name:
Type: Work Session - Action Status: Action Items
File created: 11/6/2017 In control: Board of Supervisors
On agenda: 12/6/2017 Final action: 12/6/2017
Title: Review of County Stream Buffer Regulations
Attachments: 1. Attach. A--Report-Stream Buffer Review Process, 2. Attach. B--Overview-Stream Buffer Regs
AGENDA DATE: 12/6/2017

TITLE:
Title
Review of County Stream Buffer Regulations
BODY

SUBJECT/PROPOSAL/REQUEST: Discuss results of public review process and approve recommendations for proceeding

ITEM TYPE: Regular Action Item

STAFF CONTACT(S): Richardson, Walker, Kamptner, Blair, Graham, Hannah

PRESENTER (S): David Hannah

LEGAL REVIEW: Yes

REVIEWED BY: Jeffrey B. Richardson

BACKGROUND: During a work session on May 3, 2017, the Board endorsed a Natural Resources Program for the County consisting of seven objectives. The first objective is to "Conduct a thorough public review of the stream buffer requirements of the Water Protection Ordinance." Staff has completed this review and is presenting its findings with this executive summary, with the assumption that the Board has a strong interest in improving water quality and stream health in the County.

STRATEGIC PLAN: Natural Resources Stewardship: Thoughtfully protect and manage Albemarle County's ecosystems and natural resources in both the rural and development areas to safeguard the quality of life of current and future generations.

DISCUSSION: Beginning in April 2017, staff conducted a public review of the County's stream buffer regulations. Attachment A is a report of the review process and results. Attachment B is an overview of the County's stream buffer regulations.

The primary goal of the process was to solicit input, hear various perspectives on stream buffers and regulations, and assess if changes to the regulations should be considered. The process included an online survey, meetings with three stakeholder groups, two public meetings, an informational presentation to the Planning Commission, and a web page to serve as a source of information about the process. Email and other communications were also part of the process.

The public provided a very wide range of ideas and perspectives. A clear division was observed between residents and advocates of the Rural Areas (RA) as ...

Click here for full text