Legislation Details

File #: 16-601    Version: 1 Name:
Type: Work Session - Action Status: Work Session
File created: 9/12/2016 In control: Board of Supervisors
On agenda: 11/2/2016 Final action: 11/2/2016
Title: Community Development Workload and Staffing
Attachments: 1. Attach_A_CDD_Staffing_02Nov2016.pdf
AGENDA DATE: 11/2/2016

TITLE:
Title
Community Development Workload and Staffing
BODY
SUBJECT/PROPOSAL/REQUEST: Consider authorizing additional staff in response to increased development activity

ITEM TYPE: Regular Action Item

STAFF CONTACT(S): Foley, Walker, Kamptner, Graham

PRESENTER (S): Graham

LEGAL REVIEW: Yes

REVIEWED BY: Thomas C. Foley

BACKGROUND: The Community Development Department (CDD) is currently facing distinct challenges presented from significant increases in development activity and constrained staffing resources. Attachment A provides a quantitative evaluation of development activity and staff resources. The data presents a clear picture of a increasing workload and a significant elevation in turnover in the department. The current condition of staffing capacity is impacting both development review and staff's ability to address CDD work program priorities creating a need for additional staff resources.

STRATEGIC PLAN: Goal 7: Operational Capacity. Ensure County government's ability to provide high quality service that achieves community priorities.

DISCUSSION: Staffing/Funding: CDD is currently funded with 66.5 full time equivalent employees (FTEs) compared to 85.0 FTEs in 2007 (22% less). Attachment A illustrates the effectiveness of the staffing efficiencies the department has put in place since 2010 that have improved operational effectiveness. Going forward, additional gains would require consideration of modifications to ordinance requirements or more significant fee levels above those of comparable communities.

Workload: Attachment A illustrates the increased workload CDD is experiencing. CDD workload is largely a function of the number of applications submitted. This data supports the assertion that the number of applications per planner is currently at or near record levels. While not illustrated in the graphs, the administrative support for permit processing is following a similar trend with a need fo...

Click here for full text