Skip to main content
Albemarle Logo
File #: 25-417    Version: 1 Name:
Type: Report Status: Action Items
File created: 10/7/2025 In control: Board of Supervisors
On agenda: 11/19/2025 Final action:
Title: Financial Management Policies Update
Attachments: 1. Att.A - Recommended Revisions to the County’s Financial Management Policies, 2. Att.B - Allocation of Shared Revenues Analysis
Date Ver.Action ByActionResultAction DetailsMeeting DetailsVideo
No records to display.
AGENDA DATE: 11/19/2025

TITLE:
Title
Financial Management Policies Update
BODY

SUBJECT/PROPOSAL/REQUEST: Consider revisions to the County's Financial Management Policies

ITEM TYPE: Regular Action Item

STAFF CONTACT(S): Richardson, Herrick, Sumner, Usher, Bowman

PRESENTER (S): Andy Bowman

LEGAL REVIEW: Not Required

REVIEWED BY: Jeffrey B. Richardson

BACKGROUND: According to the Government Financial Officers Association (GFOA) guidelines and the County's financial advisors, financial policies should be reviewed periodically to ensure they are current and effective. The County's Financial Policies were initially adopted by the Board of Supervisors on October 5, 1994, with the last update on September 7, 2022.

STRATEGIC PLAN: Mission - To enhance the well-being and quality of life for all community members through the provision of the highest level of public service consistent with the prudent use of public funds

DISCUSSION: Staff has conducted a review of the County's Financial Management Policies and recommends several updates. These recommendations have been reviewed by the County's financial advisors, Davenport and Company, LLC, and are attached (Attachment A). In addition to the proposed changes, Attachment A provides explanations for each specific change. In general, these changes are primarily due to the following:

1. The Allocation of Shared Revenues formula update: Additional language is recommended, consistent with the Board's direction during the FY 26 budget development process, to dedicate an amount and the future change in the value of that amount to the Affordable Housing Investment Fund.

During the FY 26 budget development process, the Board discussed similarly dedicating the change in the value of the 3.2 cents increase in the real estate tax rate that was dedicated to public safety. A majority of the Board did not direct a change to how that revenue would be shared; therefore, language for such a change is not included in ...

Click here for full text